I've always had a bit of antipathy for Jews growing up, which was bolstered by the philosemitism common in my town, so I was easily brought into all of these illogical points about them by the time I was out of high school (though not the slavery point, surprisingly). It was fortunately an intense but short go around. It's frustrating to see people still clinging to this Jewish mastermind global cabal theory. It's emasculating our own race when they do that. Furthermore, you stating that these people are acting like Marxists really does hit the nail on the head. Not something I'd considered.
I'm not sure why pro-Whites should expend any energy policing anti-Semitism. Let the jews do their own dirty work. Most 'pedestrian anti-Semitism' is promulgated by jews for the purpose of reinforcing group cohesion. Pro-Whites couldn't stop the promotion of anti-Semitism even if we wanted to. The jews need anti-Semitism more than Whites do.
I think it means that the Zionists will create and utilise antisemitism to get what they want. This is what they have done very effectively since Herzl said those words. Perceived “Antisemitism “ got Jews into Israel in large numbers and it got them carte Blanche to behave how they want towards their enemies. It gives them enormous power and support from non Jews.
In context, what Herzl is saying is that 'anti-Semitic' governments will *assist* Zionists in the emigration of jews to Israel. I wouldn't be surprised to find that this comment was made while Herzl was actively working with the NSDAP German government to emigrate jews to Israel.
Jews will *always* perceive 'anti-Semitism'. It's in their blood now. They've been cultivating anti-jewish race-hatred for millennia.
'Anti-Semitism' is the jews' way of trying to emotionalize power relations.
The idea of 'anti-Semitism' shouldn't be taken seriously by anyone.
There's a jewish power-group that likes to pretend that they make use of 'anti-Semitism' to maintain intra-jewish dynamics.
But it's all nonsense.
Jews that wanted to assimilate into their host populations have *always* had the ability to do so.
In fact, 'assimilation' is the number one 'threat' to 'jewish identity' because it's so common.
In the end, 'anti-Semitism' works in the interest of non-jews because the only way for jews to escape the mental trap they have created for themselves is to cease to be jewish and blend into their host populations.
In the end, 'anti-Semitism' isn't a real problem, 'Semitism' is.
I do know who Herzl is. I did forget that Herzl was dead by the time the NSDAP become the dominant organization in Germany. But I’m not wrong that Herzl’s Zionist movement collaborated directly with NSDAP German officials to encourage emigration from Germany (into ‘Palestine’).
Barry Stanton becoming a total pathetic AF shill in real time was soul-shattering. I’ve heard some say that he sold his account. But he totally abandoned trying to be an authentic parody in order to post retarded hot takes
Take the next steps and realize that "Hyperborea" or White Nationalism are just DEI programs for Romanians and Irish people. A way for all those who until recently were considered snow and potato n166ers to imagine they are part of a Great Race. All nonsense.
They’re fine obviously but it’s weird to suddenly assume that they, and the people of Bulgaria, Romania and Spain, are suddenly part of an expanded white hyperborean master race. That’s just DEI.
The problem is the idea that 'white hyperbole master race' is now - or ever was - a viable racial political target.
Whites have been a global minority for a long time. Now, due to an anti-White leadership, Whites are about to be drowned in a sea of color. But, yeah, you keep promoting the idea that the best way for Whites to survive is to attack Bulgarians and Spaniards.
There's no need to attack Bulgarians or Romanians but it's also silly to pretend that Anglo-Protestants share any sort of deep kinship with them. In fact, Anglo-Protestants share a lot more in common with Korean Protestants than with the average dysfunctional and corruption-prone Bulgrarian.
That's nonsense. On that theory the Archbishop of Canterbury should automatically enjoy kim-chee.
There's no evidence that culture isn't tied to genetics (race) and much evidence that it is.
Surface phenomenon like uttering the Nicene Creed has no durability compared to hundreds of thousands of years of sexual selection and environmental forces.
What makes you think that the cultural genes of an Anglo are more similar to those of a Bulgarian than to those of a Korean? Assuming the cultural genes manifest themselves indeed in… culture, there’s almost nothing of substance that is common between Bulgaria and England.
This article is fascinating in terms of the history of ideas. Whether seen as contamination or influence, the seepage of ideas across political lines has implications in terms of chaos that focused thinkers- perhaps targeted thinkers would be a better phrase - can continue on their way without ever realising. Thank you for this.
Why would I wish that you were brown? Otherwise you might have been smart enough to say something that didn't amount to folding your arms in incredulity
I'd like to see you expand on this. Specifically, I would like to see a follow-up. I am unsure what it would be about, beyond from using this as a jumping board to talk about what you consider to be major non-jewish players in our current situation.
Similar to Byrhtnoth, I grew up almost hating jews for what they have done to my family, and how their little tribe has warped the minds of everyone in my family. I ended up truly hating them the more I learned about them. However, this article does bring to attention various issues - the GDL type wignats who repeat obvious falsehoods, but these types, even "Handsome Truth", have jewish ties (oh no, conspiritards!!) but that changes little of what you wrote. No regular ass dewberry is going to do deep dives on every conspiratorial subject and come out with a robust worldview. This especially applies to the anti-semitic crowd. I can admit that I have been taken by this energy at times, but I have seen how widespread this current iteration of judaism truly is, and I can't ignore my enemies.
I know that's not what you are suggesting anyone do here, yet I genuinely feel like some of the things you are willing to accept as being the product of Whites solely is false. The promulgation of Christianity and the destructive nature of the Church on our nations - clearly traceable to jews, and taken up by Whites. This sort of behavior, I think, is widespread, especially in recent times. Some jew spearheads some new Marxist plan, and Whites take it up and spread it far and wide. GAE is a good example of this. In fact, most of what we associate with the modern West is like this. Ignoring this aspect of their abilities is just plain foolish. They have a marked ability to *sell things* to people, and the peasants of our race take this up.
However, you make good points about the false notion that jews are this all-powerful force who did every bad thing in history.
Also, Gengar Chi is a faggot and he should be bogged in a hurdle of stones.
This is what I'm talking about... "who is responsible?" is a question-begging heuristic, which conceals the agency of White Americans to have any role in its development, approval, and distribution. Essentially, Jews are poisoning Whites and they're powerless to do anything about it (unless that entails a mass uprising holocaust hitler movement Weltanschauung revolt, of course!)
I think there is much, much more to be said about this issue than "did you know the Sackler family is Jewish?", and this heuristic cuts that opportunity off right at the ankles
Ok, so the people who produce the drug and make tens of millions off the drug do not bear disproportionate responsibility for this outcome. Got it, you damned weasel.
You're not engaging in the argument. Again, just repeating this low IQ heuristic. You have concealed the agency of Whites in this with yet another low IQ heuristic—"their disproportionate responsibility"—what does this even mean?
No one is claiming that Sackler gets a pass because (reasons). I am saying your process of rationalization to construct an entire worldview of helpless Whites being victimized by the big bad Jew is irrational, pointless, and inadvertently harmful. I'll refer back to the start of the article because you're symptomatic of exactly what it details.
If you are a superior group, your destiny cannot depend on what another group is doing. To claim that our fate is not dependent on what we do, but what an outgroup does, is to suggest an ultimate inferiority.
I've always had a bit of antipathy for Jews growing up, which was bolstered by the philosemitism common in my town, so I was easily brought into all of these illogical points about them by the time I was out of high school (though not the slavery point, surprisingly). It was fortunately an intense but short go around. It's frustrating to see people still clinging to this Jewish mastermind global cabal theory. It's emasculating our own race when they do that. Furthermore, you stating that these people are acting like Marxists really does hit the nail on the head. Not something I'd considered.
A lot of people prefer to live in a fairy world ruled by all-powerful psionic child-sacrificing jewish cabals than to actually do something
I'm not sure why pro-Whites should expend any energy policing anti-Semitism. Let the jews do their own dirty work. Most 'pedestrian anti-Semitism' is promulgated by jews for the purpose of reinforcing group cohesion. Pro-Whites couldn't stop the promotion of anti-Semitism even if we wanted to. The jews need anti-Semitism more than Whites do.
"The antisemitic nations will be our best friends" Theodor Herzl.
What do you think that means?
I think it means that the Zionists will create and utilise antisemitism to get what they want. This is what they have done very effectively since Herzl said those words. Perceived “Antisemitism “ got Jews into Israel in large numbers and it got them carte Blanche to behave how they want towards their enemies. It gives them enormous power and support from non Jews.
In context, what Herzl is saying is that 'anti-Semitic' governments will *assist* Zionists in the emigration of jews to Israel. I wouldn't be surprised to find that this comment was made while Herzl was actively working with the NSDAP German government to emigrate jews to Israel.
Jews will *always* perceive 'anti-Semitism'. It's in their blood now. They've been cultivating anti-jewish race-hatred for millennia.
'Anti-Semitism' is the jews' way of trying to emotionalize power relations.
The idea of 'anti-Semitism' shouldn't be taken seriously by anyone.
There's a jewish power-group that likes to pretend that they make use of 'anti-Semitism' to maintain intra-jewish dynamics.
But it's all nonsense.
Jews that wanted to assimilate into their host populations have *always* had the ability to do so.
In fact, 'assimilation' is the number one 'threat' to 'jewish identity' because it's so common.
In the end, 'anti-Semitism' works in the interest of non-jews because the only way for jews to escape the mental trap they have created for themselves is to cease to be jewish and blend into their host populations.
In the end, 'anti-Semitism' isn't a real problem, 'Semitism' is.
Uhhh… i don’t think you know who Herzl is if you think his life overlapped with the NSDAP. The guy died in 1904.
I do know who Herzl is. I did forget that Herzl was dead by the time the NSDAP become the dominant organization in Germany. But I’m not wrong that Herzl’s Zionist movement collaborated directly with NSDAP German officials to encourage emigration from Germany (into ‘Palestine’).
Barry Stanton becoming a total pathetic AF shill in real time was soul-shattering. I’ve heard some say that he sold his account. But he totally abandoned trying to be an authentic parody in order to post retarded hot takes
Put it in great words, I tried to get a similar point across in my article on Israel but I'll probably just link this to explain it.
The Talmudic Network sends its regards.
Take the next steps and realize that "Hyperborea" or White Nationalism are just DEI programs for Romanians and Irish people. A way for all those who until recently were considered snow and potato n166ers to imagine they are part of a Great Race. All nonsense.
No more hibernophobia!!!
They’re fine obviously but it’s weird to suddenly assume that they, and the people of Bulgaria, Romania and Spain, are suddenly part of an expanded white hyperborean master race. That’s just DEI.
The Irish descend directly from the Bell-Beakers who are an offshoot of the Corded Ware (Proto-Germanics) - you are incredibly retarded.
No more of your peasant croaking.
The problem is the idea that 'white hyperbole master race' is now - or ever was - a viable racial political target.
Whites have been a global minority for a long time. Now, due to an anti-White leadership, Whites are about to be drowned in a sea of color. But, yeah, you keep promoting the idea that the best way for Whites to survive is to attack Bulgarians and Spaniards.
There's no need to attack Bulgarians or Romanians but it's also silly to pretend that Anglo-Protestants share any sort of deep kinship with them. In fact, Anglo-Protestants share a lot more in common with Korean Protestants than with the average dysfunctional and corruption-prone Bulgrarian.
That's nonsense. On that theory the Archbishop of Canterbury should automatically enjoy kim-chee.
There's no evidence that culture isn't tied to genetics (race) and much evidence that it is.
Surface phenomenon like uttering the Nicene Creed has no durability compared to hundreds of thousands of years of sexual selection and environmental forces.
What makes you think that the cultural genes of an Anglo are more similar to those of a Bulgarian than to those of a Korean? Assuming the cultural genes manifest themselves indeed in… culture, there’s almost nothing of substance that is common between Bulgaria and England.
You must be asian
You must be a sort of potato serf.
lmao
This article is fascinating in terms of the history of ideas. Whether seen as contamination or influence, the seepage of ideas across political lines has implications in terms of chaos that focused thinkers- perhaps targeted thinkers would be a better phrase - can continue on their way without ever realising. Thank you for this.
This is the best statement of this position I have encountered.
This is rubbish
Not an argument + you're an Arab (Sicilian)
You wish haha.
Why would I wish that you were brown? Otherwise you might have been smart enough to say something that didn't amount to folding your arms in incredulity
Let me read the article first and I’ll have an argument
Incredible admission
I'd like to see you expand on this. Specifically, I would like to see a follow-up. I am unsure what it would be about, beyond from using this as a jumping board to talk about what you consider to be major non-jewish players in our current situation.
Similar to Byrhtnoth, I grew up almost hating jews for what they have done to my family, and how their little tribe has warped the minds of everyone in my family. I ended up truly hating them the more I learned about them. However, this article does bring to attention various issues - the GDL type wignats who repeat obvious falsehoods, but these types, even "Handsome Truth", have jewish ties (oh no, conspiritards!!) but that changes little of what you wrote. No regular ass dewberry is going to do deep dives on every conspiratorial subject and come out with a robust worldview. This especially applies to the anti-semitic crowd. I can admit that I have been taken by this energy at times, but I have seen how widespread this current iteration of judaism truly is, and I can't ignore my enemies.
I know that's not what you are suggesting anyone do here, yet I genuinely feel like some of the things you are willing to accept as being the product of Whites solely is false. The promulgation of Christianity and the destructive nature of the Church on our nations - clearly traceable to jews, and taken up by Whites. This sort of behavior, I think, is widespread, especially in recent times. Some jew spearheads some new Marxist plan, and Whites take it up and spread it far and wide. GAE is a good example of this. In fact, most of what we associate with the modern West is like this. Ignoring this aspect of their abilities is just plain foolish. They have a marked ability to *sell things* to people, and the peasants of our race take this up.
However, you make good points about the false notion that jews are this all-powerful force who did every bad thing in history.
Also, Gengar Chi is a faggot and he should be bogged in a hurdle of stones.
The data does. As for 'substantial' commonality, the Nicene Creed isn't 'substance' it's mere opinion. Nothing could be more ephemeral.
Yes, British person and a Bulgarian are different ethnies of the White race, but both have more in common with each other than with racial aliens.
You love jews and "israel".
The Talmudic Network sends its regards
You have poor reading comprehension
Rumors of wolves keep the sheep in the line to their shepherd’s slaughterhouse.
🤣
I dont think there were 300 million whites in 1860 america
Question: Who is responsible for the OxyContin abuse epidemic in rural America?
This is what I'm talking about... "who is responsible?" is a question-begging heuristic, which conceals the agency of White Americans to have any role in its development, approval, and distribution. Essentially, Jews are poisoning Whites and they're powerless to do anything about it (unless that entails a mass uprising holocaust hitler movement Weltanschauung revolt, of course!)
I think there is much, much more to be said about this issue than "did you know the Sackler family is Jewish?", and this heuristic cuts that opportunity off right at the ankles
You implicitly claim to be high IQ, but you are confounded by the phrase “disproportionate responsibility.”
…
Interesting.
Ok, so the people who produce the drug and make tens of millions off the drug do not bear disproportionate responsibility for this outcome. Got it, you damned weasel.
You're not engaging in the argument. Again, just repeating this low IQ heuristic. You have concealed the agency of Whites in this with yet another low IQ heuristic—"their disproportionate responsibility"—what does this even mean?
No one is claiming that Sackler gets a pass because (reasons). I am saying your process of rationalization to construct an entire worldview of helpless Whites being victimized by the big bad Jew is irrational, pointless, and inadvertently harmful. I'll refer back to the start of the article because you're symptomatic of exactly what it details.
If you are a superior group, your destiny cannot depend on what another group is doing. To claim that our fate is not dependent on what we do, but what an outgroup does, is to suggest an ultimate inferiority.
The very idea of an universallly 'superior group' is a product of Abrahamo-Platonism.
I don't buy the X is jewish argument. If you are not superior, what entitles you to existence?