Very interesting. Here in Oklahoma, there is a very large Burmese population that’s appeared in the state over the last fifteen years, and it’s mostly the Catholic Church that is responsible for bringing them here. Specifically, it’s some Catholic charity group based in Kansas (the perfidious Kansan is the enemy of all Oklahomans), so the people of Oklahoma never even got a choice in the matter. The Burmese just started showing up one day and are still coming in.
All of this is exactly in line with missions work which, for hundreds of years, has been the bleeding edge of invasion. Where so-called "Christian charity" appears disposession is not far behind. Christianity has never been anything but Globalization 1.0.
It’s funny how a piece like this is always followed by another piece about how antisemitism is wrong. The thesis here is that the Jewish secretary of homeland security that opened the border to millions of migrants under Biden is less relevant compared to 600,000 people that came because of charity?
In Europe the problem is even worse, as the migrants come in the form of Islamic war refugees that hate the west. Another crisis created by the Jewish state and “solved” by Jews in Europe.
I never said antisemitism was wrong in that post, and several times is it pointed out that there are correct ways to go about it.
The primary gripe of the article was how dissidents give to jews what belongs to Europe, imbueing the jew with Europe's sins like a kapparot chicken. And here you are doing exactly that, trying to argue "the jews are doing immigration" when the data in the post conclusively shows the Catholic Church, not jews, is the largest trafficker of immigrants *globally*. Reread both articles with the intent of trying to see what my point is instead of pouting.
Interesting how whether you’re policing antisemitism from a pro- Jewish perspective or anti-Jewish perspective the effect is the same. “Criticizing Jews is great, just not like this!”
The skin suit never writes an article outlining the “correct” criticism of Jews. Many such cases.
You could lob this failure of a slander at Nietzsche and it would flop just as hilariously. What *I* find interesting is that you have zero argument for the content of either article, and can only snark & sass about what you assume my intentions are.
I'm just a smarter and more effective antisemite than you, because I value making correct propositions about them over simply trying to make the most sensational lie possible.
Did the Jew put old Europe into a freezer, and when it fell out it shattered into a million pieces? Are we interested in the truth here or not? This is something the article discussed for a few paragraphs. A few paragraphs you, again, evidently did not read.
Jewish homeland secretary, appointed by a Catholic president, confirmed by a 88% Christian, 74% White senate.
The thesis here is that the Catholic Church was responsible for nearly 30% of all immigrants in the US, until Stephen Miller—a Jew—shut down their funding.
Jew Mayorkas allows 10 million illegals under Biden because refusing immigrants is like “duh holocaust” according to him…
Jew Steven Miller stops 600,000 immigrants from charity under Trump, whose entire platform was stopping illegal immigration… wow thanks Jews! A net gain of only 9.4 million illegals instead of 10 million!
Lol stick to writing Pagan articles on worshipping trees and rocks. Your target audience seems to be wigger White people and Zionists Jews.
The barely sentient Catholic president, with an entirely Jewish cabinet and Jewish staff opened the borders, correct.
The largest trafficker of migrants is Jewish wars and billionaire Jewish activism like the open society foundation. Unless you believe that wars and political activism is less consequential than… charity? Lol.
I think we both know you are either a skin suit Jewish Zionist, or a gullible idiot. Either way the back to back articles make the shilling particularly conspicuous and amateurish.
First off they're not "back to back", they're months apart with several articles in between. No point in lying over this.
Secondly if you'd read the article "Pedestrian Antisemitism" you'd see this sentiment already argued against this. How does Jewish wars & influence explain Indians in Canada, or Russia's policy of throwing migrants at Poland's Belarus border as a form of biowarfare?
Thirdly if you'd read this article plainly, it gives clear evidence that the largest trafficker of immigrants is not "Jewish billionaires", but the Catholic Church, and they proudly admit as much.
What is the point in replying to these articles with angry quips if you don't read them in the first place? At any rate you are simply embarrassing yourself.
You have a teenagers understanding of geopolitics. NGOs like the open society foundation don’t report figures like Catholic charities do, moron.
If you’re waiting for a press release from Soros and Netanyahu that reads “This year we Jews bribed 120 politicians and allowed 10 million illegals into America” then you’re just not smart enough to engage in politics.
I get that cranking out pedestrian takes on immigration gets more engagement, but maybe stick to writing about pagan tree worship or whatever; that seems to be your primary interest anyway.
2.) Actually OSAF does report those figures as they're legally required to. Catholic Charities alone spends 10x more than them on immigrants, $200m vs $20m annually. Include the Catholic Church at large and you might as well stop counting.
3.) The assessment that the Catholic Church is the largest immigrant aid group in existence comes from a.) Their website and b.) Figures pertaining to their published impact statements and financing reports. Compared to other immigrant aid groups such as HIAS, they are absolutely deserving of that claim.
If you think any of the actual data in the article is wrong, feel free to point that out. In the mean time, "but what if soros lied" is not even a beginning to an argument.
All of the orgs mentioned in this were founded by the Church, funded by the Church, and are ran by Clergy of the Church.
You're probably thinking of the low effort posting of Catholic Charity's board recently. First off they were showing CLINIC, not CC, and secondly it wasn't even CLINIC's board - it was an employee directory of their contracted lawyers.
Let's say you're right anyways. These organizations are really just a bunch of Jews trying to replace Whites. Why then is the Catholic Church paying them billions of dollars to do it?
I am talking about the people who set up the legal framework to make this possible, as well as the leaders of these Catholic organizations. They are jews. It is not incongruous with the fact that most third world immigration into Western countries, amounting to millions of primitives every year, is led by jews. Look at large organizations such as HAIS, which had Alejandro Majorkas, the man directly responsible for holding U.S. borders open, on their board. George Soros is a jew. Barbara Lerner Spectre, the founder of Paideia in Sweden, proudly admits that jews are leading this.
They do it because they get lots of money from the government and NGOs to do it. I’m not excusing judeo-Christians for being useful idiots in this scheme to destroy the Western world, I am pointing out the ring leaders so we can know where to focus our efforts at fighting the problem.
HIAS receives a fraction of the funding and returns a fraction of the impact compared to the Catholic Church, see Complicit Clergy figures from DHS above. The Church is the largest immigrant aid organization in the world, this is well substantiated in the post. Also feel free to look at the boards of CC & CLINIC and be hit in the face with dozens of Catholic bishops with French & Irish surnames.
You're making the exact claim that this post undercuts. These aren't "useful idiots", it is the primary driving force of immigrant aid and aid to 3rd world countries. It's not judeobolshevism, it's simple and well intended Christian compassion.
You are trying to excuse the group that has always led open borders and mass immigration into all Western countries, and shifting the blame onto secondary actors. That’s Henry Makow’s trick. It’s like blaming White women for the destruction caused by feminism, or blaming men for the mass consumption of porn. Do you see what I’m saying?
No, I don't, because they're not secondary actors. The Catholic Church is the largest immigrant aid organization in the world. And you're just repeating conjectures in the face of contrary evidence
They are not conjectures, they are facts that the perpetrators themselves proudly proclaim. You are equating size with influence and responsibility, and shifting blame onto secondary actors. Inexcusable. Tschüß & Toodles.
Unpopular opinion: the Church intentionally does this to accelerate the destruction of the legacy of secularist, Masonic Enlightenment thought that espoused "Universal Brotherhood" especially after destroying its temporal power in the establishment of the Italian State.
You want progress and universal brotherhood, equality, liberty, and not the old, feudal ways of living and thinking? Have it your way.
The counterexample of an alternative would've been how the Spanish Empire dealt with the different groups of people inside; there was a caste system in place that prevented certain people from entering positions of power, but, see, Anglos really insisted that slavery should be abolished, everyone is equal, and democracy is just so swell, because Protestantism.
And now the Catholic Church is merely shoveling the dirt into the grave that these fruits of revolution dug themselves into.
Very interesting. Here in Oklahoma, there is a very large Burmese population that’s appeared in the state over the last fifteen years, and it’s mostly the Catholic Church that is responsible for bringing them here. Specifically, it’s some Catholic charity group based in Kansas (the perfidious Kansan is the enemy of all Oklahomans), so the people of Oklahoma never even got a choice in the matter. The Burmese just started showing up one day and are still coming in.
As a Catholic, this hurts to see. Excellent article.
Many Catholics speaking out against this, wanting to take their Church back. Look into orgs like CatholicVote
Thanks.
This is dark.
All of this is exactly in line with missions work which, for hundreds of years, has been the bleeding edge of invasion. Where so-called "Christian charity" appears disposession is not far behind. Christianity has never been anything but Globalization 1.0.
It’s funny how a piece like this is always followed by another piece about how antisemitism is wrong. The thesis here is that the Jewish secretary of homeland security that opened the border to millions of migrants under Biden is less relevant compared to 600,000 people that came because of charity?
In Europe the problem is even worse, as the migrants come in the form of Islamic war refugees that hate the west. Another crisis created by the Jewish state and “solved” by Jews in Europe.
I never said antisemitism was wrong in that post, and several times is it pointed out that there are correct ways to go about it.
The primary gripe of the article was how dissidents give to jews what belongs to Europe, imbueing the jew with Europe's sins like a kapparot chicken. And here you are doing exactly that, trying to argue "the jews are doing immigration" when the data in the post conclusively shows the Catholic Church, not jews, is the largest trafficker of immigrants *globally*. Reread both articles with the intent of trying to see what my point is instead of pouting.
Interesting how whether you’re policing antisemitism from a pro- Jewish perspective or anti-Jewish perspective the effect is the same. “Criticizing Jews is great, just not like this!”
The skin suit never writes an article outlining the “correct” criticism of Jews. Many such cases.
You could lob this failure of a slander at Nietzsche and it would flop just as hilariously. What *I* find interesting is that you have zero argument for the content of either article, and can only snark & sass about what you assume my intentions are.
I'm just a smarter and more effective antisemite than you, because I value making correct propositions about them over simply trying to make the most sensational lie possible.
Did the Jew put old Europe into a freezer, and when it fell out it shattered into a million pieces? Are we interested in the truth here or not? This is something the article discussed for a few paragraphs. A few paragraphs you, again, evidently did not read.
“I’m a better anti-Semite” that’s a new one lol.
It shouldn't be a new one because I said it in the article. Which you didn't read.
Jewish homeland secretary, appointed by a Catholic president, confirmed by a 88% Christian, 74% White senate.
The thesis here is that the Catholic Church was responsible for nearly 30% of all immigrants in the US, until Stephen Miller—a Jew—shut down their funding.
You're a moron.
Jew Mayorkas allows 10 million illegals under Biden because refusing immigrants is like “duh holocaust” according to him…
Jew Steven Miller stops 600,000 immigrants from charity under Trump, whose entire platform was stopping illegal immigration… wow thanks Jews! A net gain of only 9.4 million illegals instead of 10 million!
Lol stick to writing Pagan articles on worshipping trees and rocks. Your target audience seems to be wigger White people and Zionists Jews.
The barely sentient Catholic president, with an entirely Jewish cabinet and Jewish staff opened the borders, correct.
The largest trafficker of migrants is Jewish wars and billionaire Jewish activism like the open society foundation. Unless you believe that wars and political activism is less consequential than… charity? Lol.
I think we both know you are either a skin suit Jewish Zionist, or a gullible idiot. Either way the back to back articles make the shilling particularly conspicuous and amateurish.
First off they're not "back to back", they're months apart with several articles in between. No point in lying over this.
Secondly if you'd read the article "Pedestrian Antisemitism" you'd see this sentiment already argued against this. How does Jewish wars & influence explain Indians in Canada, or Russia's policy of throwing migrants at Poland's Belarus border as a form of biowarfare?
Thirdly if you'd read this article plainly, it gives clear evidence that the largest trafficker of immigrants is not "Jewish billionaires", but the Catholic Church, and they proudly admit as much.
What is the point in replying to these articles with angry quips if you don't read them in the first place? At any rate you are simply embarrassing yourself.
You have a teenagers understanding of geopolitics. NGOs like the open society foundation don’t report figures like Catholic charities do, moron.
If you’re waiting for a press release from Soros and Netanyahu that reads “This year we Jews bribed 120 politicians and allowed 10 million illegals into America” then you’re just not smart enough to engage in politics.
I get that cranking out pedestrian takes on immigration gets more engagement, but maybe stick to writing about pagan tree worship or whatever; that seems to be your primary interest anyway.
1.) That's not what geopolitics is.
2.) Actually OSAF does report those figures as they're legally required to. Catholic Charities alone spends 10x more than them on immigrants, $200m vs $20m annually. Include the Catholic Church at large and you might as well stop counting.
3.) The assessment that the Catholic Church is the largest immigrant aid group in existence comes from a.) Their website and b.) Figures pertaining to their published impact statements and financing reports. Compared to other immigrant aid groups such as HIAS, they are absolutely deserving of that claim.
If you think any of the actual data in the article is wrong, feel free to point that out. In the mean time, "but what if soros lied" is not even a beginning to an argument.
It is actually jews who set up and run the "Catholic" immigration program.
All of the orgs mentioned in this were founded by the Church, funded by the Church, and are ran by Clergy of the Church.
You're probably thinking of the low effort posting of Catholic Charity's board recently. First off they were showing CLINIC, not CC, and secondly it wasn't even CLINIC's board - it was an employee directory of their contracted lawyers.
Let's say you're right anyways. These organizations are really just a bunch of Jews trying to replace Whites. Why then is the Catholic Church paying them billions of dollars to do it?
I am talking about the people who set up the legal framework to make this possible, as well as the leaders of these Catholic organizations. They are jews. It is not incongruous with the fact that most third world immigration into Western countries, amounting to millions of primitives every year, is led by jews. Look at large organizations such as HAIS, which had Alejandro Majorkas, the man directly responsible for holding U.S. borders open, on their board. George Soros is a jew. Barbara Lerner Spectre, the founder of Paideia in Sweden, proudly admits that jews are leading this.
They do it because they get lots of money from the government and NGOs to do it. I’m not excusing judeo-Christians for being useful idiots in this scheme to destroy the Western world, I am pointing out the ring leaders so we can know where to focus our efforts at fighting the problem.
HIAS receives a fraction of the funding and returns a fraction of the impact compared to the Catholic Church, see Complicit Clergy figures from DHS above. The Church is the largest immigrant aid organization in the world, this is well substantiated in the post. Also feel free to look at the boards of CC & CLINIC and be hit in the face with dozens of Catholic bishops with French & Irish surnames.
You're making the exact claim that this post undercuts. These aren't "useful idiots", it is the primary driving force of immigrant aid and aid to 3rd world countries. It's not judeobolshevism, it's simple and well intended Christian compassion.
You are trying to excuse the group that has always led open borders and mass immigration into all Western countries, and shifting the blame onto secondary actors. That’s Henry Makow’s trick. It’s like blaming White women for the destruction caused by feminism, or blaming men for the mass consumption of porn. Do you see what I’m saying?
No, I don't, because they're not secondary actors. The Catholic Church is the largest immigrant aid organization in the world. And you're just repeating conjectures in the face of contrary evidence
They are not conjectures, they are facts that the perpetrators themselves proudly proclaim. You are equating size with influence and responsibility, and shifting blame onto secondary actors. Inexcusable. Tschüß & Toodles.
But why? What do they gain?
The feeling of being a good citizen of weimerica
Unpopular opinion: the Church intentionally does this to accelerate the destruction of the legacy of secularist, Masonic Enlightenment thought that espoused "Universal Brotherhood" especially after destroying its temporal power in the establishment of the Italian State.
You want progress and universal brotherhood, equality, liberty, and not the old, feudal ways of living and thinking? Have it your way.
The counterexample of an alternative would've been how the Spanish Empire dealt with the different groups of people inside; there was a caste system in place that prevented certain people from entering positions of power, but, see, Anglos really insisted that slavery should be abolished, everyone is equal, and democracy is just so swell, because Protestantism.
And now the Catholic Church is merely shoveling the dirt into the grave that these fruits of revolution dug themselves into.